![]() ![]() This depth of knowledge base and robust background in sonic engineering is what sets Harrison apart from the rest. Mixbus 32C 6.2.26 Harrison MixBus V5. Mixbus 32C Latest, SSL 2+ interface, Mackie VLZ 1402 mixer and Mackie Mk3 8' monitors. 3 GHz, 16GB RAM, OSX Monterey v12.6.5, 4 SSD drives, dual 27' displays. In the process of moving the Series Ten from digitally controlled analog to fully digital the factory mapped every parameter of every console they had made. Posts: 210 Threads: 56 Joined: May 2017 Reputation: 3 21. Download both and try the differences.Īs to your concern about the development time taken, don’t. There is not that much difference apart from the channel DSP is emulating a specific console by Harrison for 32C while Mixbus is more of a generalisation of their cumulative. Mixbus v5 DAW (full version): 39 XT-ME Mastering. 39 looks like a good deal for Mixbus 5 plus 5 plugins. MB is priced at a lower point and is more useable on smaller screens or as a field system.ģ2C is priced accordingly and is best used on large screens in a mix room. Mixbus has three-band EQ Mixbus 32C is designed after a different Harrison console that has four-band with the switchable top band between shelving and peaking. OscarSouth got me curious about Harrison Mixbus. The channel strips are therefore different. If you listen you will hear the difference between them I prefer 32C for the sound, extra busses and look. In 32C you have the analog modelling built upon one of the greatest consoles ever made. In MB you have EQ largely modeled on the Series Ten / 12 generations. The summing, tape saturation and dynamics are alike. They are not the same, but largely identical. So Mixbus32C is only for discriminating users and has no impact at all for regular folks listening to music ? I'm puzzled because someone who does not know that much Mixbus32C just found out that official blurb and basically said: "you see, they are the same sound wise".įrom this we can easily see why people finding out that official text will think, so why would I get Mixbus32C if sound wise it is largely identical to the regular Mixbus ? Why such a price difference to only get 12 mixbusses and not much sound wise (unless I am a discriminating user as the official also text mentions) ? What is going on here ? So this is why I'm puzzled by the choice of words making Mixbus and Mixbus32C largely identical. I, as well as many people would agree on that. (02-20-2019, 01:45 PM)Tassy Wrote: Their sounds are different and cannot even be the same as written by Harrison "largely" meaning near. The sound of Mixbus and Mixbus32C are largely identical Otherwise, it might not be a trouble per se, but rather 'trouble' as a colloquial term to say:Īll that effort, all that money spent, all that design and development. If you can do that in a couple of days in software development, well, congratulations ! (02-20-2019, 01:45 PM)Tassy Wrote: I do not see what you mean by "trouble"?Īs the official video presentation mentions, every resistor and every capacitor. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |